Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 488 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3900 - 151 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $39.95 vs $219.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4150T - $0.27 vs $1.46 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
18.493150684931507%
Price, $
$219.95
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361385 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
96.68874172185431%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
67.87383177570094%
Multi-Core
992
56.946039035591276%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |