Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1076 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4150T - 106 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $42.88 vs $219.95
- Up to 81% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4150T - $0.4 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
105
99.05660377358491%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
19.138755980861248%
Price, $
$219.95
19%
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361286 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
856
90.20021074815595%
Multi-Core
1742
56.229825693996126%
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |