Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 897 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7100T - 202 vs 200 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $66.82 vs $82.8
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4370 - $0.33 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
80.48780487804879%
Price, $
$82.8
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349943 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
99.00990099009901%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
91.47540983606557%
Multi-Core
2260
93.89281262982966%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |