Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1812 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 104 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $80.0 vs $82.8
- Up to 1% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4370 - $0.79 vs $0.8 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280542 minutes ago
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |