Buy on Amazon
$82.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1289 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Core i5-2400S - 55 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-2400S - $1.51 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $70.0 vs $82.8
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80646I34370 Core i3-4370 Haswell Dual-Core 3.8GHz LGA 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349946 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349945 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
40.65573770491803%
Multi-Core
1352
56.169505608641465%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
