Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 73% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3240 - 45 vs 26 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $41.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - $1.58 vs $2.22 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
71.17117117117117%
Price, $
$100
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349392 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
26
57.77777777777777%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
46.39865996649916%
Multi-Core
1137
48.67294520547945%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |