Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 1386 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-920 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $41.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-920 - $0.33 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
121
97.58064516129032%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
44.5945945945946%
Price, $
$90
45%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |