Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 821 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4765T - 183 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $100.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4765T - $0.55 vs $2.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348540 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
177
96.72131147540983%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
19.503546099290784%
Price, $
$498.95
20%
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348540 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |