Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1771 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $100.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $2.22 vs $7.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 38% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 62 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
72.58064516129032%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.26/FPS
30.57851239669422%
Price, $
$450
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
69.05725853094275%
Multi-Core
2336
23.290129611166503%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |