Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $100.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900K - $2.22 vs $5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 127% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 102 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
44.11764705882353%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.13/FPS
43.27485380116959%
Price, $
$522.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
40.147948890383326%
Multi-Core
2336
11.594202898550725%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |