Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 3128 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-750 - 256 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $75.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 54% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-8100T - $0.32 vs $0.7 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
45.714285714285715%
Price, $
$178.02
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361068 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
233
91.015625%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |