Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2640 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Core i7-2600K - 700 vs 682 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $70.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-8100T - $0.1 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
682
97.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
62.25535880708295%
Multi-Core
2320
76.64354146019161%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |