Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 621 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 135 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $115.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.85 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349341 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
98.51851851851852%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
41.871921182266014%
Price, $
$270
42%
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
85.44395924308587%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |