Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1057 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6800K - 106 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $108.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - $1.04 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
96.29629629629629%
Price, $
$115
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353893 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
104
98.11320754716981%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353894 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |