Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 106 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $115.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 2200G - $1.08 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353909 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
100
94.33962264150944%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
83.07692307692308%
Price, $
$130
88%
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
72.56186317321689%
Multi-Core
2858
77.89588443717635%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |