Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3809 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-920 - 174 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $90.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-9100F - $0.58 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
87.87878787878786%
Price, $
$115
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353898 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
156
89.65517241379311%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |