Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $112.53 vs $591.89
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.83 vs $3.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10400F - 150 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.95/FPS
21.0126582278481%
Price, $
$591.89
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
49.28032899246059%
Multi-Core
5751
29.29251769979117%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |