Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $112.53 vs $567.98
- Up to 67% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-13900 - $0.58 vs $1.76 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 66% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-10400F - 322 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
60.24844720496895%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353901 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
322
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
32.95454545454545%
Price, $
$567.98
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
52.984524686809145%
Multi-Core
5751
35.01156702788262%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |