Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $112.53 vs $535.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KS - $0.6 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10400F - 195 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
96.41025641025641%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
21.8978102189781%
Price, $
$535
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
80.78651685393258%
Multi-Core
5751
66.90321079571893%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |