Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-860 - 295 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $48.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 53% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - $0.18 vs $0.38 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
47.368421052631575%
Price, $
$112.53
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
273
92.54237288135593%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |