Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-8300 - 155 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $47.98 vs $112.53
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i5-10400F - $0.41 vs $0.73 per FPS
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
56.16438356164384%
Price, $
$112.53
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
76.12903225806451%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |