Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than FX-4300 - 204 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $48.02 vs $299.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-10600 - $0.25 vs $1.47 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
17.006802721088434%
Price, $
$299.95
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
92.64705882352942%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |