Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 29% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $50.0 vs $299.95
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-10600 - $0.34 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
21.38364779874214%
Price, $
$299.95
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
77.24867724867724%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
39.01203293223559%
Multi-Core
1051
17.020242914979757%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |