Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3900 - 148 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $39.95 vs $299.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-10600 - $0.32 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
15.763546798029559%
Price, $
$299.95
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349412 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
123
83.1081081081081%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
36.79544015199493%
Multi-Core
992
16.06477732793522%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |