Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-540 - 301 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $90.0 vs $133.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600KF - $0.33 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
272
90.36544850498339%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
408
24.199288256227756%
Multi-Core
841
12.333186684264556%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |