Buy on Amazon
$133
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-9800X - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $133.0 vs $545.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9800X - $1.06 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348858 minutes ago
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
96.8%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
23.555555555555557%
Price, $
$545
24%
Intel Core i7-9800X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC3)
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
