Buy on Amazon
$133
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1723
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1723
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6950X - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $133.0 vs $651.07
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6950X - $1.06 vs $5.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 20 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348972 minutes ago
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
96%
Value, $/FPS
$5.43/FPS
19.52117863720074%
Price, $
$651.07
20%
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
