Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Core i3-10100 - 182 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $99.03 vs $113.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-11400F - $0.57 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
91.93548387096774%
Price, $
$113
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353737 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
95.6043956043956%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
72.71800101988781%
Multi-Core
4215
55.40220820189275%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |