Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 49% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 247 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 30% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.46 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $109.99 vs $113.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
247
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280169 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
69%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |