Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 223 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $94.05 vs $113.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-11400F - $0.44 vs $0.51 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
86.27450980392157%
Price, $
$113
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353689 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
215
96.41255605381166%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
60.173380928097906%
Multi-Core
5480
72.02944269190326%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |