Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600KF - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $133.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600 - $0.77 vs $0.84 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
91.66666666666667%
Price, $
$150
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349398 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
96.08938547486034%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1686
79.45334590009425%
Multi-Core
6819
83.28041035661944%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |