Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7400T - 142 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $63.5 vs $150.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600 - $0.48 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
45.283018867924525%
Price, $
$150
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
132
92.95774647887323%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
47.92648444863337%
Multi-Core
2806
34.26966292134831%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |