Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 29% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-7100T - 216 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $66.82 vs $150.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600 - $0.4 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
57.97101449275364%
Price, $
$150
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
168
77.77777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
52.591894439208296%
Multi-Core
2260
27.601367855398145%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |