Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than FX-8300 - 263 vs 208 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $47.98 vs $150.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600 - $0.23 vs $0.57 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
40.35087719298246%
Price, $
$150
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
79.08745247148289%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |