Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6800K - 157 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $108.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600 - $0.78 vs $0.96 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
81.25000000000001%
Price, $
$150
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349270 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
138
87.89808917197452%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
57.68143261074458%
Multi-Core
5661
69.13776257938447%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |