Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - 142 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $79.0 vs $153.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400 - $0.62 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
57.407407407407405%
Price, $
$153
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348738 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
128
90.14084507042254%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
24.09362092703075%
Multi-Core
1085
12.264044308805245%
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |