Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3450 - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $69.0 vs $153.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - $0.62 vs $1.18 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
52.54237288135594%
Price, $
$153
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348844 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
86.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
27.673244607618173%
Multi-Core
1781
20.1311178930711%
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |