Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $63.5 vs $297.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - $0.54 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
24.657534246575345%
Price, $
$297.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
86.02941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
38.16135084427768%
Multi-Core
2806
18.898168103448278%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |