Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-4300 - 329 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $48.02 vs $593.77
- Up to 90% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-13600KF - $0.18 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
329
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
10%
Price, $
$593.77
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349956 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
274
83.28267477203647%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349956 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |