Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 84% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 81 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $46.41 vs $593.77
- Up to 86% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13600KF - $1.05 vs $7.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.33/FPS
14.324693042291953%
Price, $
$593.77
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349937 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
44
54.32098765432099%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
17.87404441208591%
Multi-Core
825
5.3519299383717165%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |