Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 227 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $50.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 90% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13600KF - $0.26 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
9.923664122137405%
Price, $
$593.77
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349278 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
84.14096916299559%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
22.424463050600654%
Multi-Core
1051
6.8180343820953615%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |