Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 121% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-6400 - 95 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $99.95 vs $593.77
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13600KF - $2.32 vs $6.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.25/FPS
37.12%
Price, $
$593.77
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
43
45.26315789473684%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
40.44412085911904%
Multi-Core
3023
19.610768731754785%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |