Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4388 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $70.0 vs $368.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 9 7900 - $0.5 vs $1.45 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 80% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-2400S - 254 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 24 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
141
55.51181102362205%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349344 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
34.48275862068966%
Price, $
$368.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
17.56373937677054%
Multi-Core
1352
8.075016424774532%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |