Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 884 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 77% cheaper than FX-9590 - $70.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-9590 - $0.33 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-2400S - 210 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
209
99.52380952380952%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
23.23943661971831%
Price, $
$298.02
23%
FPS Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
91.17647058823529%
Multi-Core
1352
62.27544910179641%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
