Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $70.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-11900F - $0.43 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in God of War than Core i5-2400S - 185 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
163
88.10810810810811%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349459 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
33.07692307692307%
Price, $
$240
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
22.84661446338093%
Multi-Core
1352
14.742121906008068%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |