Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 603 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-3240 - 124 vs 123 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $41.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 90% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-2500K - $0.33 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
10.476190476190476%
Price, $
$390.81
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
123
99.19354838709677%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
85.75851393188854%
Multi-Core
1137
59.18792295679334%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |