Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2550K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2550K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3992 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2550K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2550K
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $99.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 64% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900 - $0.37 vs $1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 107% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2550K - 549 vs 265 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2550K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2550K - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-2550K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
FPS
265
48.26958105646631%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361819 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
35.92233009708738%
Price, $
$567.98
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Single-Core
680
25.05526897568165%
Multi-Core
2040
12.41933520029222%
Intel Core i5-2550K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |