Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 57% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6950X - 549 vs 349 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $567.98 vs $651.07
- Up to 45% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6950X - $1.03 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$567.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280180 minutes ago
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |