Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $69.0 vs $247.71
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700K - $0.62 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3450 - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
89.60000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
31.313131313131315%
Price, $
$247.71
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
35.34583821805393%
Multi-Core
1781
21.874232375337755%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |