Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $69.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 1% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-11600K - $2.56 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 185% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-3450 - 77 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
27
35.064935064935064%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
99.2248062015504%
Price, $
$198.9
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
27.58462946020128%
Multi-Core
1781
20.759995337451915%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |